Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kyancutta vs Pygery.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kyancutta edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Kyancutta scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Kyancutta skews owner-occupied (83%), Pygery runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kyancutta has a heavier family-household mix (75% vs 59%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsKyancutta vs Pygery

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Kyancutta or Pygery?

Kyancutta scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Kyancutta
Metric
Pygery

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$100/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$160/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$190/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
73.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
63
Population
64
52
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
997
Avg ICSEA
997

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).