Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kyoomba vs Storm King.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Storm King edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Storm King (973) sits above Kyoomba (965). Storm King skews owner-occupied (108%), Kyoomba runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Storm King edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 965).

Common questionsKyoomba vs Storm King

Common questions

Does Kyoomba or Storm King have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Storm King scores 973 vs 965 in Kyoomba. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kyoomba
Metric
Storm King

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$245/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$275/wk
69.0%
Owner occupied
108.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
83
Population
106
48
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
3
965
Avg ICSEA
973

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).