Side by sideSuburb comparison

Laceys Creek vs Mount Byron.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Laceys Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Laceys Creek (1041) sits above Mount Byron (985). Laceys Creek skews owner-occupied (86%), Mount Byron runs more rental-dense (44% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Laceys Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (1041 vs 985). Laceys Creek also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLaceys Creek vs Mount Byron

Common questions

Does Laceys Creek or Mount Byron have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Laceys Creek scores 1041 vs 985 in Mount Byron. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Laceys Creek
Metric
Mount Byron

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$385/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$295/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$177/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
44.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
33.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
280
Population
21
45
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
20
1041
Avg ICSEA
985

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).