Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lah vs Bangerang.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lah edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lah (970) sits above Bangerang (961).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lah edges out on average school ICSEA (970 vs 961). Lah also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 74%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLah vs Bangerang

Common questions

Does Lah or Bangerang have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lah scores 970 vs 961 in Bangerang. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lah
Metric
Bangerang

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$180/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$153/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
91.0%
Owner occupied
89.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
57
Population
62
42
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
4
970
Avg ICSEA
961

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).