Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lalla vs Lower Turners Marsh.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lalla edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lalla (963) sits above Lower Turners Marsh (945). Lalla skews owner-occupied (103%), Lower Turners Marsh runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lalla edges out on average school ICSEA (963 vs 945). Lower Turners Marsh also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLalla vs Lower Turners Marsh

Common questions

Does Lalla or Lower Turners Marsh have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lalla scores 963 vs 945 in Lower Turners Marsh. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lalla
Metric
Lower Turners Marsh

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$275/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$115/wk
103.0%
Owner occupied
57.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
86
Population
28
52
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

19
Schools nearby
7
963
Avg ICSEA
945

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).