Laura vs Gladstone

Laura scores higher on walkability (30/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gladstone (998) sits above Laura (981).

Buying in Laura or Gladstone?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Laura? The free selling guide

Laura and Gladstone side by side

MeasureLauraGladstone
Renting
House rent$280/wk$205/wk
Unit rent$170/wk$950/wk
Owner occupied73.0%74.0%
Renter occupied22.0%17.0%
Schools
Schools nearby53
Average ICSEA981998
Lifestyle and people
Walk score304
Transit score00
Bike score150
Population765745
Median age4851
Climate
Annual rainfall458 mm417 mm
Mean max, January32.1°C32.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Gladstone edges out on average school ICSEA (998 vs 981).

Laura vs Gladstone: common questions

Does Laura or Gladstone have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gladstone scores 998 vs 981 in Laura. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Laura or Gladstone?

Laura scores 30/100 on walkability vs 4/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.