Lipson vs Tumby Bay

Tumby Bay scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 28/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tumby Bay (1006) sits above Lipson (997). Lipson skews owner-occupied (90%), Tumby Bay runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

Buying in Lipson or Tumby Bay?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Lipson? The free selling guide

Lipson and Tumby Bay side by side

MeasureLipsonTumby Bay
Renting
House rent–$500/wk
Unit rent–$220/wk
Owner occupied90.0%73.0%
Renter occupied6.0%22.0%
Schools
Schools nearby25
Average ICSEA9971006
Lifestyle and people
Walk score028
Transit score00
Bike score050
Population2111,781
Median age5557
Climate
Annual rainfall329 mm316 mm
Mean max, January27.8°C27.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Tumby Bay edges out on average school ICSEA (1006 vs 997). Lipson also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 62%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Lipson vs Tumby Bay: common questions

Does Lipson or Tumby Bay have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tumby Bay scores 1006 vs 997 in Lipson. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Lipson or Tumby Bay?

Tumby Bay scores 28/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.