Side by sideSuburb comparison

Liston vs Undercliffe.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Liston edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Liston (966) sits above Undercliffe (953). Undercliffe skews owner-occupied (109%), Liston runs more rental-dense (86% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Liston edges out on average school ICSEA (966 vs 953). Undercliffe also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsListon vs Undercliffe

Common questions

Does Liston or Undercliffe have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Liston scores 966 vs 953 in Undercliffe. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Liston
Metric
Undercliffe

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$235/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
109.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
130
Population
27
60
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
18
966
Avg ICSEA
953

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).