Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lithgow vs Sheedys Gully.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lithgow edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Lithgow scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Sheedys Gully skews owner-occupied (94%), Lithgow runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Sheedys Gully has a heavier family-household mix (77% vs 54%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsLithgow vs Sheedys Gully

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Lithgow or Sheedys Gully?

Lithgow scores 100/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Lithgow
Metric
Sheedys Gully

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$270/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$340/wk
62.0%
Owner occupied
94.0%
35.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
8
60
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
20
4,956
Population
136
49
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
942
Avg ICSEA
942

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).