Lockridge vs Caversham

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Caversham (1001) sits above Lockridge (996). Caversham skews owner-occupied (82%), Lockridge runs more rental-dense (66% owner).

Buying in Lockridge or Caversham?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Lockridge? The free selling guide

Lockridge and Caversham side by side

MeasureLockridgeCaversham
Renting
Owner occupied66.0%82.0%
Renter occupied31.0%16.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA9961001
Lifestyle and people
Walk score22
Transit score00
Bike score100100
Population3,3227,419
Median age3833
Climate
Annual rainfall706 mm706 mm
Mean max, January32.1°C32.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Caversham edges out on average school ICSEA (1001 vs 996). Caversham also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Lockridge vs Caversham: common questions

Does Lockridge or Caversham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Caversham scores 1001 vs 996 in Lockridge. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.