Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lockyer vs Mount Elphinstone.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Mount Elphinstone skews owner-occupied (79%), Lockyer runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Elphinstone has a heavier family-household mix (79% vs 58%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Lockyer
Metric
Mount Elphinstone

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$230/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$290/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
45.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

14
Walk score
0
Transit score
50
Bike score
1,298
Population
82
40
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
15
988
Avg ICSEA
988

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).