Side by sideSuburb comparison

Long Flat vs Mcintosh Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mcintosh Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mcintosh Creek (974) sits above Long Flat (973).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mcintosh Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 973).

Common questionsLong Flat vs Mcintosh Creek

Common questions

Does Long Flat or Mcintosh Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mcintosh Creek scores 974 vs 973 in Long Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Long Flat
Metric
Mcintosh Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$251/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$330/wk
Owner occupied
92.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
46,427
Population
173
46
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
15
973
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).