Your Property Guide

Lostock vs Mount Rivers

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Rivers (950) sits above Lostock (949).

Buying in Lostock or Mount Rivers?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Lostock? The free selling guide

Lostock and Mount Rivers side by side

MeasureLostockMount Rivers
Renting
Owner occupied76.0%79.0%
Renter occupied16.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby1820
Average ICSEA949950
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population6560
Median age4247
Climate
Annual rainfall1007 mm922 mm
Mean max, January30.0°C29.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mount Rivers edges out on average school ICSEA (950 vs 949). Mount Rivers also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 52%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Lostock vs Mount Rivers: common questions

Does Lostock or Mount Rivers have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Rivers scores 950 vs 949 in Lostock. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Lostock and Mount Rivers?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide