Louth Bay vs Whites Flat

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Whites Flat (947) sits above Louth Bay (943). Louth Bay skews owner-occupied (74%), Whites Flat runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

Buying in Louth Bay or Whites Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Louth Bay? The free selling guide

Louth Bay and Whites Flat side by side

MeasureLouth BayWhites Flat
Renting
House rent$500/wk–
Unit rent$260/wk–
Owner occupied74.0%55.0%
Renter occupied16.0%14.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1213
Average ICSEA943947
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population12554
Median age5826
Climate
Annual rainfall414 mm471 mm
Mean max, January26.4°C26.4°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Whites Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (947 vs 943). Whites Flat also has a higher family-household share (64% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Louth Bay vs Whites Flat: common questions

Does Louth Bay or Whites Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Whites Flat scores 947 vs 943 in Louth Bay. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.