Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lowden vs Beelerup.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Beelerup edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Beelerup (989) sits above Lowden (965). Beelerup skews owner-occupied (95%), Lowden runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Beelerup edges out on average school ICSEA (989 vs 965).

Common questionsLowden vs Beelerup

Common questions

Does Lowden or Beelerup have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Beelerup scores 989 vs 965 in Lowden. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lowden
Metric
Beelerup

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$255/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$255/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$138/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
95.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
165
Population
126
57
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
965
Avg ICSEA
989

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).