Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lower Peacock vs Jacksons Flat.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Jacksons Flat edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Jacksons Flat (783) sits above Lower Peacock (781).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Jacksons Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (783 vs 781). Lower Peacock also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 38%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLower Peacock vs Jacksons Flat

Common questions

Does Lower Peacock or Jacksons Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Jacksons Flat scores 783 vs 781 in Lower Peacock. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lower Peacock
Metric
Jacksons Flat

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$125/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$125/wk
Owner occupied
100.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
5
Population
41
67
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
781
Avg ICSEA
783

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).