Ludlow vs Abba River
Ludlow skews owner-occupied (67%), Abba River runs more rental-dense (52% owner).
Buying in Ludlow or Abba River?
The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guideSelling in Ludlow? The free selling guide
Ludlow and Abba River side by side
| Measure | Ludlow | Abba River |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| House rent | $350/wk | $350/wk |
| Unit rent | $285/wk | $210/wk |
| Owner occupied | 67.0% | 52.0% |
| Renter occupied | 13.0% | 10.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 10 | 10 |
| Average ICSEA | 995 | 995 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 132 | 83 |
| Median age | 42 | 39 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 703 mm | 748 mm |
| Mean max, January | 29.9°C | 29.8°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Abba River has a heavier family-household mix (90% vs 72%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Ludlow with
Choosing between Ludlow and Abba River?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.