Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lundavra vs Westmar.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Westmar edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Westmar scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lundavra has a heavier family-household mix (95% vs 76%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsLundavra vs Westmar

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Lundavra or Westmar?

Westmar scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Lundavra
Metric
Westmar

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$125/wk
$330/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
58.0%
Owner occupied
53.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
4
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
56
Population
59
36
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
919
Avg ICSEA
919

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).