Side by sideSuburb comparison

Macalister vs Ranges Bridge.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ranges Bridge edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ranges Bridge (966) sits above Macalister (935).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ranges Bridge edges out on average school ICSEA (966 vs 935). Ranges Bridge also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 72%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMacalister vs Ranges Bridge

Common questions

Does Macalister or Ranges Bridge have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ranges Bridge scores 966 vs 935 in Macalister. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Macalister
Metric
Ranges Bridge

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$210/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$255/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
43.0%
Owner occupied
44.0%
45.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
156
Population
98
40
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
5
935
Avg ICSEA
966

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).