Side by sideSuburb comparison

Macedon vs Cherokee.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cherokee edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cherokee (1088) sits above Macedon (1087). Cherokee skews owner-occupied (106%), Macedon runs more rental-dense (89% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cherokee edges out on average school ICSEA (1088 vs 1087). Cherokee also has a higher family-household share (94% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMacedon vs Cherokee

Common questions

Does Macedon or Cherokee have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cherokee scores 1088 vs 1087 in Macedon. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Macedon
Metric
Cherokee

Price & Market

$700,000
Median house
$350,640
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$371/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$371/wk
$371/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
106.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
2,073
Population
68
44
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
11
1087
Avg ICSEA
1088

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).