Side by sideSuburb comparison

Macgregor vs Upper Mount Gravatt.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Upper Mount Gravatt edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Upper Mount Gravatt (1071) sits above Macgregor (1064).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Upper Mount Gravatt edges out on average school ICSEA (1071 vs 1064).

Common questionsMacgregor vs Upper Mount Gravatt

Common questions

Does Macgregor or Upper Mount Gravatt have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Upper Mount Gravatt scores 1071 vs 1064 in Macgregor. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Macgregor
Metric
Upper Mount Gravatt

Price & Market

Median house
$997,500
Median unit
$555,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$700/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$675/wk
$349/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$700/wk
Owner occupied
51.0%
Renter occupied
44.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
100
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
37,703
Population
10,800
36
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1064
Avg ICSEA
1071

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).