Your Property Guide

Macks Creek vs Yarram

Yarram scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Yarram skews owner-occupied (73%), Macks Creek runs more rental-dense (23% owner).

Buying in Macks Creek or Yarram?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Macks Creek? The free selling guide

Macks Creek and Yarram side by side

MeasureMacks CreekYarram
Price and market
Median house–$305,000
Median unit–$190,080
Renting
Owner occupied23.0%73.0%
Renter occupied31.0%22.0%
Schools
Schools nearby44
Average ICSEA966966
Lifestyle and people
Walk score014
Transit score00
Bike score030
Population352,136
Median age4353
Climate
Annual rainfall774 mm643 mm
Mean max, January24.8°C24.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Macks Creek has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 59%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Macks Creek vs Yarram: common questions

Which is more walkable, Macks Creek or Yarram?

Yarram scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Macks Creek and Yarram?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide