Side by sideSuburb comparison

Malakoff vs Blaxland.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Malakoff edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Malakoff (959) sits above Blaxland (943).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Malakoff edges out on average school ICSEA (959 vs 943).

Common questionsMalakoff vs Blaxland

Common questions

Does Malakoff or Blaxland have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Malakoff scores 959 vs 943 in Blaxland. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Malakoff
Metric
Blaxland

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$255/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$255/wk
$217/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$217/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
14,360
Population
14,360
36
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
7
959
Avg ICSEA
943

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).