Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mandalay vs Cannonvale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cannonvale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Cannonvale scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 32/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Mandalay skews owner-occupied (72%), Cannonvale runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsMandalay vs Cannonvale

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Mandalay or Cannonvale?

Cannonvale scores 32/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mandalay
Metric
Cannonvale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$365/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$750/wk
$380/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$550/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
53.0%
28.0%
Renter occupied
45.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
32
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
338
Population
6,596
41
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
1001
Avg ICSEA
1001

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).