Manjimup vs Ringbark

Manjimup scores higher on walkability (94/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Ringbark skews owner-occupied (103%), Manjimup runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

Buying in Manjimup or Ringbark?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Manjimup? The free selling guide

Manjimup and Ringbark side by side

MeasureManjimupRingbark
Price and market
Median house$340,000–
Median unit$275,000–
Renting
House rent–$235/wk
Unit rent–$180/wk
Owner occupied63.0%103.0%
Renter occupied34.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby55
Average ICSEA980980
Lifestyle and people
Walk score940
Transit score00
Bike score800
Population4,279110
Median age4248
Climate
Annual rainfall857 mm857 mm
Mean max, January27.7°C28.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Ringbark has a heavier family-household mix (106% vs 63%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Manjimup vs Ringbark: common questions

Which is more walkable, Manjimup or Ringbark?

Manjimup scores 94/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.