Side by sideSuburb comparison

Marsden Park vs Windsor Downs.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,165,000 and $2,460,000. Marsden Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Marsden Park (median $1,165,000) is roughly 53% cheaper to buy into than Windsor Downs ($2,460,000). Over the past year, Marsden Park (+14%) ran 9.3 percentage points ahead of Windsor Downs (+4.7%) on house-price growth.

Marsden Park scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Windsor Downs (1017) sits above Marsden Park (968). Windsor Downs skews owner-occupied (93%), Marsden Park runs more rental-dense (77% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Marsden Park is the lower entry point at $1,165,000 median, 53% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Marsden Park carries both higher gross yield (2.41% vs 0.85%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Windsor Downs edges out on average school ICSEA (1017 vs 968).

Common questionsMarsden Park vs Windsor Downs

Common questions

Is Marsden Park or Windsor Downs cheaper to buy in?

Marsden Park has the lower median house price at $1,165,000, roughly 53% below Windsor Downs ($2,460,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Marsden Park or Windsor Downs?

Over the past 12 months, Marsden Park grew +14% vs +4.7% in Windsor Downs, a gap of 9.3 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Marsden Park or Windsor Downs have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Windsor Downs scores 1017 vs 968 in Marsden Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Marsden Park or Windsor Downs?

Marsden Park scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Marsden Park or Windsor Downs?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.41% in Marsden Park vs 0.85% in Windsor Downs. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Marsden Park
Metric
Windsor Downs

Price & Market

$1,165,000
Median house
$2,460,000
$446,400
Median unit
$348,480
+14.0%
Annual growth (house)
+4.7%
Days on market

Rental

$540/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$570/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$420/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
93.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
5.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
0
14,610
Population
1,183
32
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
968
Avg ICSEA
1017

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).