Your Property Guide

Matta Flat vs Kadina

Kadina scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 78/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Matta Flat skews owner-occupied (83%), Kadina runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

Buying in Matta Flat or Kadina?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Matta Flat? The free selling guide

Matta Flat and Kadina side by side

MeasureMatta FlatKadina
Renting
House rent–$520/wk
Unit rent–$300/wk
Owner occupied83.0%67.0%
Renter occupied17.0%28.0%
Schools
Schools nearby55
Average ICSEA933933
Lifestyle and people
Walk score078
Transit score00
Bike score55
Population822,944
Median age4349
Climate
Annual rainfall361 mm361 mm
Mean max, January30.9°C30.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Matta Flat has a heavier family-household mix (86% vs 64%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Matta Flat vs Kadina: common questions

Which is more walkable, Matta Flat or Kadina?

Kadina scores 78/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Matta Flat and Kadina?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide