Maudsland vs Mount Nathan
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Maudsland (1033) sits above Mount Nathan (1023). Mount Nathan skews owner-occupied (92%), Maudsland runs more rental-dense (81% owner).
Buying in Maudsland or Mount Nathan?
Selling in Maudsland? The free selling guide
Maudsland and Mount Nathan side by side
| Measure | Maudsland | Mount Nathan |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| House rent | $970/wk | – |
| Unit rent | $540/wk | – |
| Owner occupied | 81.0% | 92.0% |
| Renter occupied | 18.0% | 7.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 20 | 20 |
| Average ICSEA | 1033 | 1023 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 95 | 0 |
| Population | 8,073 | 1,375 |
| Median age | 34 | 40 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 1332 mm | 1309 mm |
| Mean max, January | 29.2°C | 29.5°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Maudsland edges out on average school ICSEA (1033 vs 1023).
Maudsland vs Mount Nathan: common questions
Does Maudsland or Mount Nathan have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Maudsland scores 1033 vs 1023 in Mount Nathan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Maudsland with
Choosing between Maudsland and Mount Nathan?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.