Mena Park vs Mount Emu
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Emu (998) sits above Mena Park (994). Mena Park skews owner-occupied (58%), Mount Emu runs more rental-dense (33% owner).
Buying in Mena Park or Mount Emu?
Selling in Mena Park? The free selling guide
Mena Park and Mount Emu side by side
| Measure | Mena Park | Mount Emu |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 58.0% | 33.0% |
| Renter occupied | – | 33.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 4 | 5 |
| Average ICSEA | 994 | 998 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 32 | 28 |
| Median age | 48 | 26 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 587 mm | 577 mm |
| Mean max, January | 26.8°C | 26.6°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Mount Emu edges out on average school ICSEA (998 vs 994).
Mena Park vs Mount Emu: common questions
Does Mena Park or Mount Emu have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Emu scores 998 vs 994 in Mena Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Mena Park with
Choosing between Mena Park and Mount Emu?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.