Mitchells Flat vs Scotts Flat

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mitchells Flat (952) sits above Scotts Flat (939). Mitchells Flat skews owner-occupied (89%), Scotts Flat runs more rental-dense (29% owner).

Buying in Mitchells Flat or Scotts Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mitchells Flat? The free selling guide

Mitchells Flat and Scotts Flat side by side

MeasureMitchells FlatScotts Flat
Renting
House rent$640/wk$640/wk
Unit rent$480/wk$480/wk
Owner occupied89.0%29.0%
Renter occupied4.0%43.0%
Schools
Schools nearby47
Average ICSEA952939
Lifestyle and people
Walk score0–
Transit score0–
Bike score0–
Population24243
Median age4332
Climate
Annual rainfall685 mm655 mm
Mean max, January31.4°C31.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mitchells Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (952 vs 939). Mitchells Flat also has a higher family-household share (92% vs 33%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Mitchells Flat vs Scotts Flat: common questions

Does Mitchells Flat or Scotts Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mitchells Flat scores 952 vs 939 in Scotts Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.