Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mittagong vs Renwick.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mittagong edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Renwick skews owner-occupied (82%), Mittagong runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Renwick has a heavier family-household mix (86% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Mittagong
Metric
Renwick

Price & Market

$1,120,311
Median house
$684,750
Median unit
+18.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
42 days
Days on market

Rental

$430/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$430/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$620/wk
68.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied
17.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

92
Walk score
40
Transit score
5
Bike score
6,090
Population
1,453
49
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
15
1043
Avg ICSEA
1043

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).