Side by sideSuburb comparison

Monkey Mia vs Denham.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Denham scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 20/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Monkey Mia (901) sits above Denham (894).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Monkey Mia edges out on average school ICSEA (901 vs 894).

Common questionsMonkey Mia vs Denham

Common questions

Does Monkey Mia or Denham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Monkey Mia scores 901 vs 894 in Denham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Monkey Mia or Denham?

Denham scores 20/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Monkey Mia
Metric
Denham

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$187/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
Owner occupied
53.0%
Renter occupied
38.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
20
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
5
995
Population
849
43
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
2
901
Avg ICSEA
894

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).