Side by sideSuburb comparison

Moody vs Wharminda.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wharminda edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wharminda (1018) sits above Moody (1012).

Moody
Metric
Wharminda

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$178/wk
$213/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$151/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
19
Population
19
49
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
1012
Avg ICSEA
1018

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wharminda edges out on average school ICSEA (1018 vs 1012). Wharminda also has a higher family-household share (160% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMoody vs Wharminda

Common questions

Does Moody or Wharminda have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wharminda scores 1018 vs 1012 in Moody. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.