Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Alma vs River Ranch.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. River Ranch edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving River Ranch (956) sits above Mount Alma (953). River Ranch skews owner-occupied (80%), Mount Alma runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

River Ranch edges out on average school ICSEA (956 vs 953).

Common questionsMount Alma vs River Ranch

Common questions

Does Mount Alma or River Ranch have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), River Ranch scores 956 vs 953 in Mount Alma. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Alma
Metric
River Ranch

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$275/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$275/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
55.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
59
Population
269
40
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
3
953
Avg ICSEA
956

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).