Mount Aquila vs Farnham

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Aquila (898) sits above Farnham (895). Farnham skews owner-occupied (100%), Mount Aquila runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

Buying in Mount Aquila or Farnham?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mount Aquila? The free selling guide

Mount Aquila and Farnham side by side

MeasureMount AquilaFarnham
Renting
House rent$450/wk$450/wk
Owner occupied63.0%100.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1213
Average ICSEA898895
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population621
Median age2857
Climate
Annual rainfall676 mm616 mm
Mean max, January29.8°C30.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mount Aquila edges out on average school ICSEA (898 vs 895). Farnham also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Mount Aquila vs Farnham: common questions

Does Mount Aquila or Farnham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Aquila scores 898 vs 895 in Farnham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.