Mount Bindango vs Roma

Roma scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Mount Bindango skews owner-occupied (75%), Roma runs more rental-dense (51% owner).

Buying in Mount Bindango or Roma?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mount Bindango? The free selling guide

Mount Bindango and Roma side by side

MeasureMount BindangoRoma
Price and market
Median house–$340,000
Median unit–$365,000
Renting
House rent–$470/wk
Unit rent–$300/wk
Owner occupied75.0%51.0%
Renter occupied–45.0%
Schools
Schools nearby22
Average ICSEA945945
Lifestyle and people
Walk score0100
Transit score00
Bike score0100
Population266,838
Median age4335
Climate
Annual rainfall551 mm542 mm
Mean max, January34.6°C34.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Roma has a heavier family-household mix (65% vs 38%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Mount Bindango vs Roma: common questions

Which is more walkable, Mount Bindango or Roma?

Roma scores 100/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.