Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Chalmers vs Tungamull.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tungamull edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tungamull (948) sits above Mount Chalmers (939).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tungamull edges out on average school ICSEA (948 vs 939). Tungamull also has a higher family-household share (90% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMount Chalmers vs Tungamull

Common questions

Does Mount Chalmers or Tungamull have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tungamull scores 948 vs 939 in Mount Chalmers. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Chalmers
Metric
Tungamull

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$330/wk
$355/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
87.0%
Owner occupied
93.0%
4.0%
Renter occupied
3.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
226
Population
429
47
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
939
Avg ICSEA
948

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).