Mount Irvine vs Mount Tomah

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Tomah (1049) sits above Mount Irvine (1036). Mount Tomah skews owner-occupied (89%), Mount Irvine runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

Buying in Mount Irvine or Mount Tomah?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mount Irvine? The free selling guide

Mount Irvine and Mount Tomah side by side

MeasureMount IrvineMount Tomah
Renting
House rent–$740/wk
Owner occupied50.0%89.0%
Renter occupied–18.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2017
Average ICSEA10361049
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population2268
Median age6757
Climate
Annual rainfall1219 mm1246 mm
Mean max, January26.8°C26.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mount Tomah edges out on average school ICSEA (1049 vs 1036). Mount Tomah also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Mount Irvine vs Mount Tomah: common questions

Does Mount Irvine or Mount Tomah have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Tomah scores 1049 vs 1036 in Mount Irvine. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.