Mount Irving vs Mount Tyson

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Tyson (961) sits above Mount Irving (932). Mount Tyson skews owner-occupied (89%), Mount Irving runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

Buying in Mount Irving or Mount Tyson?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mount Irving? The free selling guide

Mount Irving and Mount Tyson side by side

MeasureMount IrvingMount Tyson
Renting
Owner occupied71.0%89.0%
Renter occupied21.0%20.0%
Schools
Schools nearby66
Average ICSEA932961
Lifestyle and people
Walk score–0
Transit score–0
Bike score–0
Population34280
Median age5540
Climate
Annual rainfall570 mm577 mm
Mean max, January31.7°C31.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mount Tyson edges out on average school ICSEA (961 vs 932). Mount Tyson also has a higher family-household share (95% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Mount Irving vs Mount Tyson: common questions

Does Mount Irving or Mount Tyson have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Tyson scores 961 vs 932 in Mount Irving. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.