Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Isa vs Miles End.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Isa edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Mount Isa scores higher on walkability (22/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Miles End skews owner-occupied (65%), Mount Isa runs more rental-dense (27% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Isa has a heavier family-household mix (79% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsMount Isa vs Miles End

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Mount Isa or Miles End?

Mount Isa scores 22/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Isa
Metric
Miles End

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$175/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
27.0%
Owner occupied
65.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

22
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
90
172
Population
280
35
Median age
31

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
13
875
Avg ICSEA
875

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).