Mount Jukes vs Belmunda
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Belmunda (959) sits above Mount Jukes (953). Belmunda skews owner-occupied (133%), Mount Jukes runs more rental-dense (90% owner).
Buying in Mount Jukes or Belmunda?
Selling in Mount Jukes? The free selling guide
Mount Jukes and Belmunda side by side
| Measure | Mount Jukes | Belmunda |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 90.0% | 133.0% |
| Renter occupied | 9.0% | – |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 6 | 7 |
| Average ICSEA | 953 | 959 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 373 | 6 |
| Median age | 45 | 60 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 1966 mm | 1653 mm |
| Mean max, January | 30.5°C | 31.0°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Belmunda edges out on average school ICSEA (959 vs 953). Belmunda also has a higher family-household share (133% vs 86%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Mount Jukes vs Belmunda: common questions
Does Mount Jukes or Belmunda have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Belmunda scores 959 vs 953 in Mount Jukes. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Mount Jukes with
Choosing between Mount Jukes and Belmunda?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.