Mount Kelly vs Osborne

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Osborne (932) sits above Mount Kelly (922).

Buying in Mount Kelly or Osborne?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mount Kelly? The free selling guide

Mount Kelly and Osborne side by side

MeasureMount KellyOsborne
Renting
Owner occupied83.0%–
Renter occupied9.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby166
Average ICSEA922932
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population291–
Median age42–
Climate
Annual rainfall828 mm820 mm
Mean max, January32.2°C32.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Osborne edges out on average school ICSEA (932 vs 922).

Mount Kelly vs Osborne: common questions

Does Mount Kelly or Osborne have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Osborne scores 932 vs 922 in Mount Kelly. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.