Mount Kynoch vs Cranley

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Kynoch (970) sits above Cranley (963). Cranley skews owner-occupied (69%), Mount Kynoch runs more rental-dense (51% owner).

Buying in Mount Kynoch or Cranley?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mount Kynoch? The free selling guide

Mount Kynoch and Cranley side by side

MeasureMount KynochCranley
Renting
House rent–$660/wk
Unit rent–$330/wk
Owner occupied51.0%69.0%
Renter occupied48.0%25.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA970963
Lifestyle and people
Walk score–0
Transit score–0
Bike score–0
Population2712,281
Median age2960
Climate
Annual rainfall807 mm807 mm
Mean max, January29.2°C29.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mount Kynoch edges out on average school ICSEA (970 vs 963). Mount Kynoch also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Mount Kynoch vs Cranley: common questions

Does Mount Kynoch or Cranley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Kynoch scores 970 vs 963 in Cranley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.