Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Mackay vs Silky Oak.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Silky Oak edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Silky Oak (935) sits above Mount Mackay (930).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Silky Oak edges out on average school ICSEA (935 vs 930).

Common questionsMount Mackay vs Silky Oak

Common questions

Does Mount Mackay or Silky Oak have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Silky Oak scores 935 vs 930 in Mount Mackay. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Mackay
Metric
Silky Oak

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$213/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
Owner occupied
73.0%
Renter occupied
20.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
5,525
Population
178
43
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
4
930
Avg ICSEA
935

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).