Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Tabor vs Canningvale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Canningvale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Canningvale (953) sits above Mount Tabor (948).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Canningvale edges out on average school ICSEA (953 vs 948). Canningvale also has a higher family-household share (72% vs 43%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMount Tabor vs Canningvale

Common questions

Does Mount Tabor or Canningvale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Canningvale scores 953 vs 948 in Mount Tabor. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Tabor
Metric
Canningvale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$221/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$226/wk
Owner occupied
81.0%
43.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
5
Bike score
0
19
Population
118
41
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
11
948
Avg ICSEA
953

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).