Mount Warning vs Uki.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,212,500 and $1,100,000.
Uki (median $1,100,000) is roughly 10% cheaper to buy into than Mount Warning ($1,212,500).
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Warning (998) sits above Uki (992).
For buyers
Uki is the lower entry point at $1,100,000 median, 10% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Uki offers the higher gross rental yield (1.65% vs 1.50%), favouring cash-flow investors.
For families
Mount Warning edges out on average school ICSEA (998 vs 992). Uki also has a higher family-household share (69% vs 46%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Is Mount Warning or Uki cheaper to buy in?
Uki has the lower median house price at $1,100,000, roughly 10% below Mount Warning ($1,212,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Does Mount Warning or Uki have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Warning scores 998 vs 992 in Uki. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Mount Warning or Uki?
Gross rental yield on houses is 1.65% in Uki vs 1.50% in Mount Warning. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Mount Warning against another suburb