Mount Whitestone vs Caffey
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Whitestone (962) sits above Caffey (952). Caffey skews owner-occupied (87%), Mount Whitestone runs more rental-dense (69% owner).
Buying in Mount Whitestone or Caffey?
Selling in Mount Whitestone? The free selling guide
Mount Whitestone and Caffey side by side
| Measure | Mount Whitestone | Caffey |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 69.0% | 87.0% |
| Renter occupied | 19.0% | 27.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 14 | 17 |
| Average ICSEA | 962 | 952 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 129 | 45 |
| Median age | 50 | 45 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 681 mm | 697 mm |
| Mean max, January | 31.6°C | 31.2°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Mount Whitestone edges out on average school ICSEA (962 vs 952).
Mount Whitestone vs Caffey: common questions
Does Mount Whitestone or Caffey have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Whitestone scores 962 vs 952 in Caffey. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Mount Whitestone with
Choosing between Mount Whitestone and Caffey?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.