Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Whitestone vs Caffey.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Whitestone edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Whitestone (962) sits above Caffey (952). Caffey skews owner-occupied (87%), Mount Whitestone runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Whitestone edges out on average school ICSEA (962 vs 952).

Common questionsMount Whitestone vs Caffey

Common questions

Does Mount Whitestone or Caffey have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Whitestone scores 962 vs 952 in Caffey. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Whitestone
Metric
Caffey

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
69.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied
27.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
129
Population
45
50
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
17
962
Avg ICSEA
952

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).