Side by sideSuburb comparison

Munbilla vs Kents Lagoon.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Munbilla skews owner-occupied (93%), Kents Lagoon runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Munbilla has a heavier family-household mix (87% vs 60%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Munbilla
Metric
Kents Lagoon

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$255/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$270/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
93
Population
60
42
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
11
981
Avg ICSEA
981

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).