Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mundulla vs Buckingham.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Mundulla skews owner-occupied (86%), Buckingham runs more rental-dense (21% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mundulla has a heavier family-household mix (74% vs 64%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Mundulla
Metric
Buckingham

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$205/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$165/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
21.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
432
Population
40
50
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
3
965
Avg ICSEA
965

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).