Side by sideSuburb comparison

Murmungee vs Gapsted.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Murmungee edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Murmungee (1029) sits above Gapsted (1015). Murmungee skews owner-occupied (91%), Gapsted runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Murmungee edges out on average school ICSEA (1029 vs 1015).

Common questionsMurmungee vs Gapsted

Common questions

Does Murmungee or Gapsted have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Murmungee scores 1029 vs 1015 in Gapsted. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Murmungee
Metric
Gapsted

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$80/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$256/wk
91.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
18.0%
Renter occupied
22.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
35
69
Population
156
54
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
4
1029
Avg ICSEA
1015

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).